Trust + Value + Loyalty = Successful Relational Online Exchange

Consumer Trust, Value, and Loyalty in Relational Exchanges

Sirdeshmukh, Singh and Sabol (2002) conducted a survey to develop a framework on how companies can build or deplete consumers trust depending on the services and mechanisms they use on developing a relationship with customers, in order to provide value and gain loyalty.

How these can be gained online is revealed further down.

The authors defend the argument that trust exist when one part has confidence in the exchange partner’s reliability. When it comes to online business, at the beginning is a difficult to transmit confidence to the stakeholder, but it can be gained with a good website.

Customers also make judgments about the frontline employee (sales persons) and management policies and practices during the exchange services. Applied online, the frontline employees disappear and what it makes their function is the website, its distribution, how attractive it is for internet user, the facilities it gives them to surf on the page. While the management policies and practices are the interaction with stakeholders if they have inquiries, the payment options or the service provided on the delivery.

The authors also argue that the satisfaction is mostly sensitive to interactional factors, which contributes uniquely for trust relationship to be built.

There are different relationship with the organization, Interpersonal relations with sales person and stores loyalty. The authors support that sales person are more trusted than store for those people who have strong interpersonal ties, on the other hand, people who don’t have interpersonal ties, are more loyal to stores. People who are price sensitive will care more about stores where they can buy things cheaply rather than other people who care more about quality and services.

The same pattern can be applied online as well - there are also people who care more about price than quality or service.

The overall satisfaction with a service has three different facets: the contact person (online is the website), core service (online the facilities provided to customers) and the organization.

Dimensions of trustworthy Behaviours and Practices and Their Effects on Trust

Operational competence is a visible behaviour; it is an indicator of service actions, degree to which partners perceive each other as having the skills, abilities, and knowledge necessary for effective task performance.

In the online world the operational competences is based on the interaction with customers, trying to solve their problems interacting online.

Operational benevolence is the underlining motivation to place the consumer's interest ahead of self-interest. Online this is difficult to transmit, the only way to do it is developing a good relationship and accomplishing the deals with customers offering them the service requested, the customers will perceive the companies "goodwill" which can be transmitted from customer to customer using blogs for example or word of mouth.

Problem-solving orientation is the management motivation to anticipate and resolve problems in a satisfactory way, to resolve problems during and after the service. Online this means to solve customers’ problems to find what they want, its delivery, payment or technical issues. And then find a solution not to repeat them again.

Consumer trust and loyalty

In conclusion, when providers act in a way that consumer trusts, the perceived risk with the specific service is likely to be reduced and thus enable consumer to make confident predictions about the provider's future behaviours.

Trust also influences loyalty by affecting the consumer's perception of congruence in values with the provider. When there is perceived similarity between the firm and the consumer values, the relationship is enhanced, promoting reciprocity and contributing to long-term commitment.

Loyalty is regulated by the consumer's goal of value, and the authors posit that trust will effects loyalty through its influence in creating value.

Trust and loyalty are vitally important for company’s reputation to be built both off and online. However, building them online is more difficult because of the lack of face-to-face communication but could be overcome with a useful and interactive website.


References:

Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J., and Sabol, B. (2002). Customer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. Journal of Marketing, 66, 15-37.

Key Factors For A Successful Web-Site

The explosive growth of the Internet led to utilizing the Web pages as an important area of digital communication. Very often, when browsing on Internet, web sites are the cues that provide first impression of a certain organisation. Furthermore, these online spaces are sometimes crucial to either weaken or strengthen company’s reputation. When a person opens a web site, it probably takes few seconds for the first impression to be created, and the user will either stay or move on to the next site on the basis of many factors.

Knowing the purpose and objectives of the Site help to determine what it can be offered to the customers and how the site structure will achieve it. Design priorities allow companies to match customers’ needs: purchase a product/service, find information, save money/time, or talk to the organization (Chaffey and Smith 2005).

But, what factors determine whether a Website is good or bad and encourage visitors back again and again? Previous research showed that product visibility and the use of search engines is a key element (Rowley 2000). Kolesar and Galbraith (2000) stick for the easy to use aspect while the structure and how the information is linked within the page was studied by Ceri et al. (2000). Few years later, Huarng and Christopher (2003) refer to information search tools as key elements for a good design whereas Siddiqui et al. (2003) analyzed the navigational issues. For the purpose of this article usability and accessibility will be discussed.





Usability refers to how easy the web site is for everyone to use without errors, accessing the information as quickly as possible in order to provide satisfaction (Yates 2005). This term is vital for the success; if the website is difficult to use, the homepage does not explain properly what business you are in, if the information is not clear and the user get lost, people switch off to another site (Chaffey and Smith 2005). Elements such as the time that takes to complete a task, sometimes appeal more to the customers than the speed to download something. Appearance and design are important but they will never replace usability, and any website lack of it will not be able to keep or encourage new visitors.

Accessibility refers to all barrier-free characteristics of the website that allow visitors interact with it regardless of the disabilities they may have (Yates 2005). Usability and accessibility complement each other and sometimes overlap because if someone can´t access the website obviously they can´t use it neither (BLOG). The next model adapted from Webdale (2003) shows the relationship between usability and accessibility to improve the user experience.



Accessibility requires management support and trained staff to integrate these elements into their web strategies. Despite the cost exercise to improve accessibility, the benefits associated for all stakeholders and customers prove that is necessary to implement it together with usability in order to create an effective site (Yates 2005).


REFERENCES
Rowley, J. (2000) “Product search in e-shopping: a review and research propositions”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17 (1), 20-35.

Kolesar, M. and Galbraith, R. (2000) “A services-marketing perspective on e-retailing: implications for e-retailers and directions for further research”, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 10 (5), 424-38.

Ceri, S., Fraternali, P. and Bongio, A. (2000) “Web modeling language (WebML): a modeling language for designing web sites”, Computer Networks, 33, 137-57.

Huarng, A. and Christopher, D. (2003) “Planning an effective internet retail store”, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 21 (4), 230-8.

Siddiqui, N., O’Malley, A., McColl, J. and Birtwistle, G. (2003) “Retailer and consumer perceptions of online fashion retailers: web site design issues”, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 7 (4), 345-55.

Webdale, J. (2003) Accessibility [online] available from<> [31 April 2010].
http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/web-development/success-factors/

USABILITY NEWS:
http://www.usabilitynews.com/
USABILITY RESOURCES:
http://www.usabilityfirst.com/
ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES:
www.w3.org/WAI

100 Killer Web Accessibility Resources.
http://whdb.com/2008/100-killer-web-accessibility-resources-blogs-forums-and-tutorials/

What Everybody Ought to Know About Usability and Web Design.
http://www.blogdesignblog.com/blog-design/usablity-web-design/